Carrie Lacey asked a hard hitting question about politics
and trying to be friends with someone that has opposing views.
Deep breaths...
Well Carrie, politics is a touchy subject that when touched
upon often leads to more painful touching. So where to start? Firstly, there is
only one person in the entire world you (and any other person in the entire
world) can control. That person is you. Even if one has children, one cannot
control them. Oh, one can control the child's actions to some extent, but even
that control is an illusion. Think of siblings who have had the very same
upbringing yet grow into completely opposite adults and their parents
wondering, "what the hell!? I know we taught him better than that!"
That being said, wouldn't the world be very boring if we all
thought the same way about everything? It would be very sad, truly because in
all things there are different perspectives. One person could not possibly
conceive of all the ins, outs and intricacies of life.
I have a dear friend whose only area of commonality was that
our children were in kindergarten together, but I wanted to be her friend. We
don't share religious views, we have different lifestyles and we couldn't be
more different, but I love her. Not her religious views, not her lifestyle, not
her politics, her. And because she didn't see things exactly the way I did, my
views expanded. It didn't change the way I believed, but I saw her value.
The problem with politics, I think, is two fold. The first
being is it is difficult to understand where another person is coming from when
we don't have the same life experiences. If one person grows up in a two parent
household, it is difficult for the person who's parents are still together to
really understand certain concerns.
For example: Mr. D's parents have been married for over
forty years. To each other. My parents separated when I was 11 and divorced
when I was 13. Even my mother's second marriage was a debacle. So when Mr. D
and I hit fourteen years some time back, I was a mess the entire year. Even
though we were no where near the dire straits of my parents (remember they were
separated for two years before) it still was the place where my parents fell
apart. This is the conversation I had with Mr. D as that anniversary rolled
around.
Me: "Babe, I want you to know that even though we are
not my parents, I may be a little sensitive for a bit. It has nothing to do
with you, it's all in my head, but I thought you should know."
Him: "But we're nothing like your parents."
Me: "I'm pretty sure I just said that."
Him: "Well just don't think that way."
Me: "Well gosh, why didn't I think of that?"
Him: "What can I do to help?"
Me: "Just be who you are. It's something I have to work
through."
Him: "I don't understand."
Me: "I gathered."
The point is from where we stand things seem pretty straight
forward and logical, but the other person feels the same way about their point
of view. We don't hand out questionnaires when we embark on friendships. We
generally strike up with people with similar (read not exact) interests, but
it's our differences that keep things interesting.
The second problem lies in how we deal with those
differences. It is the lions share of the problem because we as a people have
forgotten how to discuss our differences like adults. Instead we start calling
names and questioning intelligence like we never left high school. I can
promise you, no one who has been told they are dumber than a sack of hammers
has EVER stopped and said, "you know what? You're right, I am dumber than
a sack of hammers. I see things in a whole new light. Thank you, thank you, for
saving me from my incredible incompetence and clearly misguided notions."
Never happens.
For example, I was once asked out by a boy who I worked
with. We talked a bit and generally enjoyed these conversations. So imagine my
disgust when he, having just asked me out, turned and walked away when he
learned I was Mormon. I'm Mormon, not a Nazi war criminal, but his entire view
changed. Everything he liked about me disappeared and all he could see was what
he felt was an unacceptable (religious) belief. We didn't have to get married,
but to go from friends to strangers in a matter of minutes was kinda rude. The
best way to be friends with persons whose political views are different than
yours is to remember the things you love about them.
If two opposing views can be respectfully discussed, by all
means, proceed. If one of you decides to roll in the mud, bless their heart and
change the subject because when you roll with pigs you get dirty too. For
example:
Bless his (ignorant heart), he couldn't find his way out of
a wet paper bag with a map and a compass.
Bless her (melodramatic) heart. It's so hard when she isn't
the center of attention.
Bless his (downer) heart. He got peanut butter and jelly in
his lunch again.
Bless her (willfully stupid) heart. She still thinks the
world is flat.
One invokes blessing of hearts when one has encountered a
confounding situation. It can be used when dealing with the ignorant, the drama
queen (a gender-less behavior), the downer and yes, the willfully stupid.
The Bless your/his/her/their heart works like this: the
Blesser presses her lips together as she remembers her commitment to stay out
of the aforementioned mud and verbally or mentally blesses the blessee.
Here's where it gets tricky. If the person who's heart you
are blessing is from the south, do not, I repeat DO NOT bless their heart out
loud. And whatever you do, remember allowing yourself to be pulled into
pointless debates only ruins your day. Some people can't understand, some
people don't understand and some people won't understand.
If you (the reader) are the bringer of contention, shame on
you. I thought I taught you better than that.
So when we are friends with people who have different
political views (or any opposing views, really) than our own, does it mean we
have to agree with those views? Not remotely, but we can disagree without being
disagreeable. Novel concept, I know, but it's amazing when put into practice.
And all arguments absolutely require a minimum of two people.
One more point: blanket statements are my pet peeve. They
are completely inaccurate, but are constantly draped over anyone the blanketer
disagrees with. STOP IT! Nobody ever "always" or "nevers".
Hope this helps.
No comments:
Post a Comment